ECVP 2011 Abstract
doi:10.1068/v110463

Cite as:
Baker D H, Meese T S, Georgeson M A, Hess R F, 2011, "How much of noise masking derives from noise?" Perception 40 ECVP Abstract Supplement, page 51

How much of noise masking derives from noise?

D H Baker, T S Meese, M A Georgeson, R F Hess

In masking studies, external luminance noise is often used to estimate an observer's level of internal (neural) noise. However, the standard noise model fails three important empirical tests: noise does not fully linearise the slope of the psychometric function, masking occurs even when the noise is identical in both 2AFC intervals, and double pass consistency is too low. This implies the involvement of additional processes such as suppression from contrast gain control or increased uncertainty, either of which invalidate estimates of equivalent internal noise. We propose that jittering the target contrast (cf Cohn, 1976 Journal of the Optical Society of America 66 1426–1428) provides a 'cleaner' source of noise because it excites only the detecting mechanism. We compare the jitter condition to masking from 1D and 2D (white and pink) pixel noise, pedestals and orthogonal masks, in double pass masking and (novel) contrast matching experiments. The results show that contrast jitter produced the strongest masking, greatest double pass consistency, and no suppression of perceived contrast: just as the standard model of noise masking predicts (and unlike pixel noise). We attribute the remainder of the masking from pixel noise to contrast gain control, raising concerns about its use in equivalent noise masking experiments.

These web-based abstracts are provided for ease of seaching and access, but certain aspects (such as as mathematics) may not appear in their optimum form. For the final published version of this abstract, please see
ECVP 2011 Abstract Supplement (complete) size: 2206 Kb

[Publisher's note: The abstracts in this year's ECVP supplement have been published with virtually no copy editing by Pion, thus the standards of grammar and style may not match those of regular Perception articles.]