Cite as:
Bindemann M, Sandford A, Gillatt K, Avetisyan M, Megreya A M, 2012, "Recognising faces seen alone or with others: Why are two heads worse than one?" Perception 41(4) 415 – 435
Download citation data in RIS format
Recognising faces seen alone or with others: Why are two heads worse than one?
Markus Bindemann, Adam Sandford, Katherine Gillatt, Meri Avetisyan, Ahmed M Megreya
Received 28 January 2011, in revised form 2 March 2012
Abstract. The ability to identify an unfamiliar target face from an identity lineup declines when the target is accompanied by a second face during visual encoding. This two-face disadvantage is still little studied and its basis remains poorly understood. We investigated several possible explanations for this phenomenon. Experiments 1 and 2 varied the number of potential targets (1 or 2) and the number of faces in a lineup (5 or 10) to explore if this effect arises from the number of identity comparisons that need to be made to detect a target in a lineup. We also explored if this effect arises from an uncertainty concerning which is the to-be-identified target in two-face displays, by cueing the relevant face during encoding. In experiment 3 we then examined whether the two-face disadvantage reflects the depth of face encoding or a memory effect. The results show that this effect arises from the additional comparisons that are necessary to compare two potential targets to an identity lineup when memory demands are minimised (experiment 1), but it reflects a difficulty in remembering several faces when targets and lineups cannot be viewed simultaneously (experiments 2 and 3). However, in both cases the two-face disadvantage could not be eliminated fully by cueing the target. This hints at a further possible locus for this effect, which might reflect perceptual interference during the initial encoding of the target. The implications of these findings are discussed.
This article has supplementary online material: Supplementary figures
Restricted material:
Full-text PDF size: 526 Kb
References 45 references, 33 with DOI links (
)
Your computer (IP address: 54.242.233.11) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).
