2009 volume 38(11) pages 1721 – 1727
doi:10.1068/p6138

Cite as:
Bayrakci B, Forouz A, Sahin A B, Abali M, Aliyeva G Z, 2009, "Disease painting or painting disease: How does illness and hospitalisation affect children’s artistry?" Perception 38(11) 1721 – 1727

Download citation data in RIS format

Disease painting or painting disease: How does illness and hospitalisation affect children’s artistry?

Benan Bayrakci, Aria Forouz, Ahmet B Sahin, Mustafa Abali, Gyulten Z Aliyeva

Received 28 July 2008, in revised form 23 July 2009; published online 6 October 2009

Abstract. There are numerous speculations about famous artists and how their perception was affected by their medical conditions. In this study, we examined how illness and hospitalisation affect children’s art. A total of 157 paintings by 122 hospitalised children were interpreted by three reputed artists. Works of ill children were compared with those of a control group from an international art exhibition. We also comment on how diseases influenced the technique of famous artists to further examine the possible impact of illness on the artistry of hospitalised children. Developmental delay in painting was evident in the study group. Use of ready-made schemas was a common practice (55%). 56% of the work from patients older than eight years failed in perspective and site perception. The theme in 89% of the drawings had no human figures. Projection of self sufferings, prominent elementary lines, and reflection of distorted perception could be clearly recognised in various study materials; anxiety about assigned surgery was exhibited by scribbling. There exists a close relationship between medicine and humanities. The interpretation of fine art from a medical perspective may help to increase our appreciation of the suffering of an individual. It is obvious that diseases change the artistic style and inner perspective. The question is how do healthcare specialists view this?

This article has supplementary online material: Colour figures

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 644 Kb

HTML References  21 references, 11 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 54.234.42.16) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).