2007 volume 36(10) pages 1535 – 1545
doi:10.1068/p5852

Cite as:
Everdell I T, Marsh H, Yurick M D, Munhall K G, Paré M, 2007, "Gaze behaviour in audiovisual speech perception: Asymmetrical distribution of face-directed fixations" Perception 36(10) 1535 – 1545
Download citation data in RIS format

Gaze behaviour in audiovisual speech perception: Asymmetrical distribution of face-directed fixations

Ian T Everdell, Heidi Marsh, Micheal D Yurick, Kevin G Munhall, Martin Paré

Received 9 October 2006, in revised form 27 March 2007

Abstract. Speech perception under natural conditions entails integration of auditory and visual information. Understanding how visual and auditory speech information are integrated requires detailed descriptions of the nature and processing of visual speech information. To understand better the process of gathering visual information, we studied the distribution of face-directed fixations of humans performing an audiovisual speech perception task to characterise the degree of asymmetrical viewing and its relationship to speech intelligibility. Participants showed stronger gaze fixation asymmetries while viewing dynamic faces, compared to static faces or face-like objects, especially when gaze was directed to the talkers’ eyes. Although speech perception accuracy was significantly enhanced by the viewing of congruent, dynamic faces, we found no correlation between task performance and gaze fixation asymmetry. Most participants preferentially fixated the right side of the faces and their preferences persisted while viewing horizontally mirrored stimuli, different talkers, or static faces. These results suggest that the asymmetrical distributions of gaze fixations reflect the participants’ viewing preferences, rather than being a product of asymmetrical faces, but that this behavioural bias does not predict correct audiovisual speech perception.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 311 Kb

HTML References  43 references, 30 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 54.224.75.101) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).