Cite as:
Rosielle L J, Hite L A, 2009, "The caricature effect in drawing: Evidence for the use of categorical relations when drawing abstract pictures" Perception 38(3) 357 – 375
Download citation data in RIS format

The caricature effect in drawing: Evidence for the use of categorical relations when drawing abstract pictures

Luke J Rosielle, Lesley A Hite

Received 30 May 2007, in revised form 13 August 2008

Abstract. Five experiments were conducted to determine how novice and expert drawers represent relative size for the purposes of drawing. Participants were shown images of two-part or three-part geometric figures composed of two spatially separated shapes. In each picture there was a small but noticeable relative-size difference between the constituent shapes (one part of the picture was always 25% larger than another part). Participants later drew the pictures from memory. The results showed that novice and expert drawers consistently exaggerated the relative size relationship between the shapes in the picture when attempting to draw it from memory and when copying (the ‘caricature effect’), although the effect was reduced for the experts. The results are consistent with the idea that people represent size in memory using categorical descriptors (eg ‘smaller than’, ‘larger than’) rather than as precise metrics. Further, the results suggest that the process of becoming a skilled drawer may involve overcoming this categorical bias.

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 819 Kb

 References  51 references, 25 with DOI links ()

Your computer (IP address: 107.20.129.212) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).