Cite as:
Thornton I M, Rensink R A, Shiffrar M, 2002, "Active versus passive processing of biological motion" Perception 31(7) 837 – 853
Download citation data in RIS format

Active versus passive processing of biological motion

Ian M Thornton, Ronald A Rensink, Maggie Shiffrar

Received 20 April 2000, in revised form 6 November 2001

Abstract. Johansson's point-light walker figures remain one of the most powerful and convincing examples of the role that motion can play in the perception of form (Johansson, 1973 Perception & Psychophysics 14 201 - 211; 1975 Scientific American 232(6) 76 - 88). In the current work, we use a dual-task paradigm to explore the role of attention in the processing of such stimuli. In two experiments we find striking differences in the degree to which direction-discrimination performance in point-light walker displays appears to rely on attention. Specifically, we find that performance in displays thought to involve top - down processing, either in time (experiment 1) or space (experiment 2) is adversely affected by dividing attention. In contrast, dividing attention has little effect on performance in displays that allow low-level, bottom - up computations to be carried out. We interpret these results using the active/passive motion distinction introduced by Cavanagh (1991 Spatial Vision 5 303 - 309).

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 351 Kb

 References  53 references, 23 with DOI links ()

Your computer (IP address: 107.21.186.38) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).