1993 volume 22(9) pages 1099 – 1110
doi:10.1068/p221099

Cite as:
Power R P, 1993, "Tests of the dipole model of perceived movement in apertures" Perception 22(9) 1099 – 1110

Download citation data in RIS format

Tests of the dipole model of perceived movement in apertures

Roderick P Power

Received 5 March 1992, in revised form 1 October 1992

Abstract. Power and Moulden (1993) have proposed a dipole model to account for the apparent movement of gratings in apertures. This includes movement orthogonal to the orientation of the grating, and the barber pole illusion: the illusion that a grating drifting diagonally across a narrow aperture appears to be moving along it. The essence of the model is that movement is signalled by a large number of dipoles, of many orientations and lengths. These dipoles respond if, and only if, one end is stimulated, and then the other. Three experiments intended to test predictions from the model are reported here. In each case a horizontal grating drifted across an aperture and subjects fixated outside the aperture. In experiment 1 subjects fixated just above or below the aperture, and reported the motion aftereffect (MAE) shown by a set of test spots. As predicted by the model, the spots further from the fixation point showed a strong MAE. Experiment 2 combined both viewing conditions of experiment 1, so that test spots above and below the fixation point were viewed simultaneously. The predictions were confirmed since test spots further from the fixation point exhibited a stronger MAE than test spots. closer to the fixation point. In experiment 3 the fixation point in all conditions was below the aperture and, as predicted, the MAE of a spot near the bottom of the aperture was diagonally upward, although stimulation was horizontal. Again, as predicted, the MAE of a spot in the middle of the aperture appeared to move horizontally. Finally, it was predicted that a test spot at the top of the aperture would appear to move diagonally downwards, but subjects were unable to report unequivocally the direction of motion, since the MAE was occurring too far from fovea for clear vision. Overall, then, the predictions from the model were confirmed, although there are associated phenomena the model cannot as yet account for.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 1634 Kb

Your computer (IP address: 50.16.132.180) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).