1992 volume 21(4) pages 545 – 557
doi:10.1068/p210545

Cite as:
Brown S W, Stubbs D A, 1992, "Attention and interference in prospective and retrospective timing " Perception 21(4) 545 – 557

Download citation data in RIS format

Attention and interference in prospective and retrospective timing

Scott W Brown, D Alan Stubbs

Received 24 July 1990, in revised form 29 October 1991

Abstract. Subjects listened to a series of musical selections and then judged the duration of each selection. Some subjects were informed beforehand that timing was involved (prospective timing) whereas others were informed afterwards (retrospective timing). Half the groups performed a concurrent proofreading task during stimulus presentation. The results showed a trade-off between temporal and nontemporal task performance: prospective-timing groups were more accurate in judging time and were worse at proofreading, whereas retrospective-timing goups were relatively poor at judging time but better at proofreading. This pattern is consistent with Michon's notion of an essential equivalence between temporal and nontemporal processing, and supports the predictions of an attentional allocation model of timing. The proofreading task interfered both with prospective and with retrospective timing, and both types of time judgments were influenced in the same way by effects of stimulus context. These results imply that similar timing processes operate under prospective and retrospective conditions.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 1810 Kb

Your computer (IP address: 54.204.68.123) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).