Cite as:
Fitzpatrick V, Pasnak R, Tyer Z E, 1982, "The effect of familiar size at familiar distances" Perception 11(1) 85 – 91
Download citation data in RIS format

The effect of familiar size at familiar distances

Virginia Fitzpatrick, Robert Pasnak, Zita E Tyer

Received 23 January 1981, in revised form 12 June 1981

Abstract. The effect of familiar size as a distance cue was tested with familiar objects at familiar distances. Experiment 1 showed that there were no uncontrolled distance cues available and that in their absence the retinal image did not affect depth or size perception. Under these conditions, size and distance judgments were essentially indeterminate and independent of each other. In experiment 2 a paradigm was employed which allowed a direct determination of whether equivalent changes either in size of a familiar object or in its true distance produced equivalent changes in its perceived distance. The results showed that there were no uncontrolled distance cues, and that subjects perceived the familiar object as having its familiar size. Moreover, changing the retinal image of the objects had almost exactly the same effect on their perceived distance as did changing their true distance. Hence, familiar size does effectively govern the perception of distance when there are no competing cues.

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 925 Kb

Your computer (IP address: 23.20.196.179) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).